At the precise apical of the Wikipedia nonfiction “List of artificial objects connected the Moon” is simply a abbreviated disclaimer: Though the database includes much than a 100 objects, it is acold from complete. Not included are the “lesser” items littering the lunar surface—the pins, statues, play balls, plaques, hammers, and memorials that moonwalkers person near behind. Among them is an entity called the Lunar Library. It is simply a benignant of ark, designed to sphere an everlasting taste representation of quality civilization. Etched onto a expanse of nickel, successful a nano-font truthful minuscule it tin beryllium work lone done a microscope, are the implicit texts of thousands of large written works from crossed the ages. Near the apical of this last testament of our taxon is an English-language variation of Wikipedia, the encyclopedia anybody tin edit.
Unlike the insubstantial Bible near down by NASA moonwalker David R. Scott successful 1971, the Lunar Library’s signifier is impervious to gamma radiation and expected to past billions of years. For Wikipedia, being engraved into eternity represented a triumph agelong delayed. In 2007, it had go the largest encyclopedia ever to exist, ending the reign of the imperial Chinese Yongle encyclopedia aft six 100 years. Some called it the archetypal integer wonderment of the world, yet it had reached this milestone to meager fanfare. Tributes were muted, and the lone statue monumentalizing its accomplishment small known, arsenic it stood, for immoderate reason, successful the Polish borderline municipality of Słubice (pop. 16,000).
So erstwhile successful 2018 a backstage satellite lander named Beresheet ferried the Lunar Library into orbit, it was an elevated grant successful an unusually literal sense. The craft’s languid two-month formation way ended supra the satellite connected April 11, 2019, wherever it took lone a fewer seconds for 7 years of readying to travel undone. Beresheet mislaid interaction with its faraway pilots and past dropped done the bladed atmosphere, crashing with specified unit that a glittering nickel disk was flung acold crossed the look of the Sea of Tranquility. The Lunar Library had, successful the words of its creator, been turned into a “30 cardinal leafage Frisbee.” It has ne'er been seen since.
Wikipedia is sui generis, 1 of the strangest and astir outlandish successes of its time, rather dissimilar what came earlier it oregon thing acceptable to win it.
At archetypal this bungled tribute seemed different letdown for Wikipedia. But it was, successful its way, perfect. The Lunar Library’s unscheduled last formation was a sympathetic homage: unpredictable, chaotic, impervious to control, and much far-reaching than anyone expected. Wikipedia is sui generis, 1 of the strangest and astir outlandish successes of its time, rather dissimilar what came earlier it oregon thing acceptable to win it. Since its commencement twenty-five years ago, it has go portion of the cloth of mundane life, softly indivisible from the acquisition of seeking information, a default with nary evident precedent oregon competitor. For astir of its lifespan, it has enjoyed a unsocial supremacy—not lone an encyclopedia, but the encyclopedia, a notation enactment to extremity each others.
Though Wikipedia has been consulted trillions of times and work by billions of people, precise fewer of those billions cognize however it works oregon wherever it came from. One of Wikipedia’s galore perplexing qualities is the deficiency of curiosity it provokes. Even those broadly enthusiastic astir the encyclopedia sometimes donate wealth to “pay for the information checkers,” unaware that it doesn’t person any, oregon astatine slightest not immoderate who are paid. Its nationalist representation is intertwined with Wikipedia’s figurehead, Jimmy Wales, successful portion due to the fact that pictures of his plaintive look truthful often travel appeals for those donations. The look is assuring, kindly, bearded. Wales erstwhile compared speechmaking Wikipedia to eating a sausage: “you mightiness similar the sensation of it, but you don’t needfully privation to spot however it’s made.”
Here is portion of the paradox that made Wikipedia possible. Its immense standard and scope sprang from an experimentation that was extremist and adjacent shocking erstwhile it was archetypal attempted. Rather than restricting the instauration of cognition to luminaries and experts, it entrusted anyone who wanted to participate, and past fto them enactment however they wanted to. Its presumption arsenic “the people’s encyclopedia” violated the hierarchy of expertise that preceded it, and still, a quarter-century on, Wikipedia has ne'er rather shaken that archetypal flush of the ridiculous. “Everybody distrusts Wikipedia and everybody uses it,” a cynic erstwhile remarked, a world that held for years. A earthy countertendency has formed, particularly among its fans, to importune the task beryllium taken much seriously. But that ridiculousness should beryllium appreciated. It had a invaluable protective function: Had anyone predicted Wikipedia’s existent worth during its formative phase, it would ne'er person survived.
This deficiency of curiosity mightiness explicate the scarcity of nonacademic books astir Wikipedia. Some of this is prejudice, too. For a time, galore writers and journalists disdained Wikipedia arsenic a mode of burnishing their ain credentials arsenic professionals. They feared—rightly—what mightiness hap if it failed, and erstwhile it did work, they fretted that it was moving excessively well. Gather the titles astir Amazon, Google, and the different phenomena that specify the online world, and unneurotic they tin cram a bookshop. Wikipedia tin hardly capable a shelf, and its aboriginal play arsenic a “startup” is adjacent little represented. As the lone nonprofit endeavor among its peers, Wikipedia’s communicative doesn’t beryllium successful the concern section. There are nary fiscal numbers to acceptable the stakes, and its formed of characters, with uncommon exceptions, includes neither executives nor employees. Though a wont of caput places it adjacent to the titans of Silicon Valley, it stands awkwardly isolated (this is apt; it didn’t travel from Silicon Valley either). It shares the communicative arc of a drama instead, 1 of those 1980s comedies wherever the nerds and misfits bushed the affluent kids successful the large game, though successful this large game, the “rich kids” were nerds and misfits too.
Reflect further, and Wikipedia whitethorn not beryllium successful the “tech” conception either. It is not a technological miracle, astatine slightest not successful the mode a smartphone is. The bundle that makes it tally is good regarded without being revolutionary. Its astir important breakthroughs were taste breakthroughs. Look again astatine the Lunar Library, and you tin spot that Wikipedia is an uncanny object. It is immense and tiny astatine the aforesaid time. Its entirety, some substance and images, tin acceptable onto a $5 thumb drive. Look it up successful Jack Lynch’s past of notation works (called You Could Look It Up: The Reference Shelf from Ancient Babylon to Wikipedia), and Wikipedia’s leafage number is listed arsenic “zero,” and its size and value are marked arsenic “none.” Wikipedia has non-Newtonian properties. It is monumental portion having astir nary distinctive carnal beingness astatine all, a confounding effect that makes it hard to appraise. It is some excessively large to recognize and someway excessively ephemeral to fuss trying.
Why effort now? The remedial reply would beryllium to accidental that we should cognize however it works and wherever it came from and that this has present go urgent: Thanks to artificial intelligence, much radical are utilizing Wikipedia unknowingly than ever before. Delve further, and we onslaught a much unexpected question. What is Wikipedia? Not everyone agrees it is an encyclopedia, and it is truthful chiseled from everything other called an encyclopedia that it deserves a caller name. It could, with justification, beryllium called a hyperpedia, oregon a massively multi-editor online encyclopedia. But determination is nary request for caller jargon: the connection “wikipedia” is itself a coinage, a portmanteau of “wiki” and “encyclopedia.” The connection marries 2 inventions, 1 from the eighteenth period and 1 from the twentieth. A modern encyclopedia compiles summaries of knowledge; a wiki is simply a leafage connected the net that tin beryllium edited by anyone. Each is overmuch much almighty than it archetypal appears. Combining them turned retired to beryllium 1 of the twenty-first century’s astir consequential ideas, and 1 that is inactive not afloat understood oregon appreciated.
Wikipedia is not lone the largest encyclopedia written by humans. It is besides the past encyclopedia humans volition ever write.
Wikipedia is besides an event, a improvement successful time. It is an enactment of corporate taste creation—the largest enactment of this benignant successful history—that was tightly concentrated betwixt 2001 and 2008, erstwhile the present-day signifier of the task took shape. The decision of this play tin beryllium identified—it is the infinitesimal Wikipedia’s maturation rate, erstwhile exponential, became linear. We inactive thin to usage the word “digital era” successful a hazy, ballpark benignant of way, a vague motion to the fig of computers astir the place, though the existent displacement is overmuch sharper. Sometime successful 2002, the quantity of integer accusation successful beingness overtook the quantity of analog accusation successful existence. It is not a coincidence that the commencement of Wikipedia sits astatine the precise halfway of this process, 1 of a caller breed of informational behemoths.
It is conscionable this captious play wherever the modern sum of Wikipedia is thinnest. Because it was considered unimportant erstwhile it started, important moments had small media involvement oregon were neglected outright. Controversies stay unresolved, cardinal figures forgotten, and cardinal strands of its root communicative underestimated oregon ignored. Like immoderate encyclopedia, Wikipedia is besides a written enactment and remains profoundly underappreciated arsenic a landmark successful the past of writing, reading, and editing. Once seen arsenic a literate accumulation of tremendous size, it besides turns retired to person a hidden pedigree successful the humanities.
It mightiness dependable pretentious to telephone Wikipedians heirs to Voltaire, Diderot, and Leibniz (especially if they were listening to Insane Clown Posse astatine the time), but this turns retired to beryllium existent successful a profound way. Not lone bash philosophy, literature, and past play a portion successful this story, but truthful bash little expected influences similar architecture and poetry. At a clip erstwhile the humanities are successful eclipse, these legacies are much precious still. They are besides liable for 1 of Wikipedia’s astir unheralded qualities—its beauty. Out of the crooked timber of Wikipedia’s imperfections, wonderment has been made. The aforesaid distortions that look squalid oregon irritating tin besides marque grandeur; Annie Rauwerda, who runs the fashionable societal media relationship Depths of Wikipedia, compared this sensation of appreciation to stumbling connected “abandoned cathedrals.”
Already it is the quality of thing fragile. Younger radical lone cognize the encyclopedic signifier astatine each due to the fact that Wikipedia has sustained it. Loss defines the integer property conscionable arsenic overmuch arsenic abundance: Of each the information created successful 2020 (a precise ample proportionality of the information that has ever been created), little than 2 percent was saved and retained into 2021. In 2014, the BBC reported that online past was disappearing with breakneck speed, creating what it called “a achromatic spread for aboriginal historians.” Reach retired to corroborate thing from lone a fewer years ago, and often it turns retired to beryllium deleted, oregon corrupted, oregon trapped connected a mislaid disk successful a half-forgotten format. Recent past tin consciousness much distant than the paperbound past that preceded it. Meanwhile, the memories of the radical who made Wikipedia, though fading, tin inactive beryllium accessed.
Wikipedia is not lone the largest encyclopedia written by humans. It is besides the past encyclopedia humans volition ever write. Thanks to artificial intelligence, we indispensable use the caller statement “human-authored” to Wikipedia, and the circumstances that created it person foreclosed. It is an escapee from a parallel universe, a exile of the net arsenic it should person been, alternatively of the net arsenic it is. We subordinate size with strength, but it tin present weakness arsenic well. Wikipedia could yet drown successful a tidal question of AI slop oregon beryllium overshadowed by computer-composed encyclopedias of adjacent much unfeasible size. Experiments are already trying to bring specified monstrosities to life. Less melodramatic ends await Wikipedia too—being breached up into parts oregon withering done neglect arsenic audiences brushwood it successful places wherever it tin beryllium read, but not edited. After years of noncombatant presumption successful the civilization wars (occupying the no-man’s-land betwixt “trust the experts” and “do your ain research”), it has attracted caller attraction from unsafe governmental enemies, overseas and domestic.
Digital empires, erstwhile fallen, permission fewer ruins. Wikipedia mightiness not beryllium glittering oregon extraterrestrial, but this is my effort astatine preservation. A means to say: we saw it made, and it was good.
_______________________________
Excerpted from The Last Best Place connected the Internet: A Human History of Wikipedia by Richard Cooke. Copyright © 2026 by Richard Cooke. Used with support of the publisher, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
English (US) ·