This archetypal appeared successful Lit Hub’s Craft of Writing newsletter—sign up here.
In 2006, erstwhile I started penning the publication that would yet go my debut caller The True Confessions of First Lady Freeman, I shared my first, tentative pages with a person and asked for feedback. The main quality was Rebecca, a thirty-five-year-old, recently divorced pistillate who is co-parenting with her ex-husband and starting to day again. Basically me, astatine that time, but that dissimilar mine, Rebecca’s ex was a pastor. My friend’s feedback was little and blunt: “This is okay… but benignant of boring. I privation to spot that marriage.”
I did not privation to spot that marriage. I had conscionable near an unhappy marriage, and I wasn’t keen connected creating a fictional 1 and dwelling successful it for the clip it would instrumentality to constitute a novel.
But I knew my person was right. There wasn’t overmuch going connected successful Rebecca’s world, arsenic I had written it. Co-parenting and dating each person the imaginable for precocious drama, but not a novel’s worth, not successful and of themselves.
Worst of all, thing was astatine involvement for Rebecca. She had thing to lose. What was the worst happening that could happen? A atrocious date? A custody fight? Was that the publication I wanted to write?
Even the character’s sanction was snoozy. No shadiness to Rebeccas, but the 1 successful the draught was giving Sunnybrook Farm.
I’m alert that I’m penning this arsenic if idiosyncratic other wrote that dry-ass draft. But it was me, suffering from no-slash-low-stakes-first-draft-itis, a self-diagnosed information that besides plagues my abbreviated fiction. Thankfully, determination is simply a cure. Whether I’ve completed an underwhelming archetypal draught oregon americium inactive successful the process of penning one, present are a fewer strategies I usage to determination my characters and their stories from dud to delicious:
Give them thing to want, thing to lose
I took my friend’s proposal and moved Rebecca backmost into her marriage. After marrying the antheral of her dreams, she enjoys the respectability, societal status, and worldly trappings of being a megachurch pastor’s wife, aka a archetypal lady. If that matrimony falls apart, she has plentifulness to lose.
My determination to marque Rebecca’s hubby the pastor of a megachurch besides influenced the communicative and its stakes. A highly disposable pastor with a nationalist estimation and his woman person overmuch much to suffer if their matrimony problems go public, than, say, a mediocre state preacher and his wife.
But adjacent with this change, I realized I’d written Rebecca into a corner. Despite the perks, she hated being a archetypal woman (as I would), hated being successful the spotlight (as I would), and wasn’t definite she adjacent believed successful Christianity (like me). Further, Rebecca’s libido was connected 10 conscionable arsenic her husband, 15 years her senior, seemed to beryllium losing involvement successful sex. She’d gotten everything she’d wanted by marrying “up,” but she was inactive unhappy. If her matrimony ended, would she truly number it arsenic a loss?
Lesson learned: If a quality has already gotten everything they want, springiness them thing other to want.
Enter the First Lady USA pageant. I created the pageant erstwhile I flipped Rebecca, who was miserable being a archetypal lady, into Scharisse, who loved each infinitesimal of it. Unfortunately, the different archetypal ladies ostracized her due to the fact that she lacked the due religion miss pedigree arsenic the girl of an unwed teenaged mother. Schar wanted thing much than to beryllium embraced by the different archetypal ladies. So she acceptable her sights connected winning the pageant, winning implicit her chap contestants on the way, and becoming the eventual archetypal lady.
To rise the stakes further, I threw an obstacle successful Schar’s way—a ungraded that could extremity her matrimony arsenic good arsenic her accidental astatine the First Lady USA title. Another extremity for raising stakes: Keep making things worse. Figure retired what’s the past happening the quality wants to happen, oregon the astir unfair oregon unexpected happening that could happen, oregon the worst imaginable happening that could happen—and marque it happen.
Timing is everything
Tweaking the timing oregon timeline successful your communicative tin ratchet up the stakes arsenic well. How mightiness starting the communicative 5 years later, oregon earlier, adhd complexity and challenges? What if The One Who Got Away shows up during your honeymoon signifier with your caller spouse and not connected the time aft you motion divorcement papers?
Not lone did I determination Rebecca-now-Schar backmost successful clip and into her marriage, I aged her daughter, Gabrielle, from 5 to fifteen. A nationalist ungraded and a rocky matrimony volition person precise antithetic implications for a teen than they volition for a kindergartener. And those implications and complications for Gabrielle ended up shaping my novel’s communicative considerably.
Figure retired what’s the past happening the quality wants to happen, oregon the astir unfair oregon unexpected happening that could happen, oregon the worst imaginable happening that could happen—and marque it happen.
The First Lady USA pageant is different illustration of however timing tin rise stakes. Anything with a acceptable day oregon deadline sets a timepiece ticking. Something has to hap by oregon earlier that lawsuit day oregon deadline, oregon other determination volition beryllium consequences for the main characters and/or others. And determination tin beryllium aggregate ticking clocks successful the aforesaid story. When Scharisse and the different contestants stitchery to motorboat the pageant, which is inactive months away, she has 8 days to triumph implicit these women who despise her.
No angels, nary demons
Give your “good” characters immoderate edge, immoderate flaws. Once I freed Schar up to person values and interests that differed from mine, to marque choices I’d ne'er make, and to genitor successful ways I ne'er would, she became acold much interesting. And she had overmuch much to lose.
Likewise, springiness your atrocious guys immoderate complexity. I don’t judge villainous oregon different unlikeable characters request to beryllium redeemed. In fact, I similar that they aren’t. As a scholar and arsenic a writer, I find it overmuch much absorbing to spot more of them, their layers and contradictions, alternatively than a healed, improved, repentant mentation of them, oregon immoderate heavy-handed, expositional apologia for wherefore they are the mode they are.
In my novel, Schar’s archnemesis, caput deaconess Sheila Battle, began arsenic a emblematic judgmental, holier-than-thou religion lady. But successful my aboriginal drafts, I wrote a country that reveals that there’s overmuch much to Sheila than meets the eye, hilariously so. At the extremity of the book, Sheila is inactive judgmental and holier-than-thou. But we’ll ne'er unsee everything other that she is, arsenic well.
*
Twenty years ago, my person saw thing successful my budding caller that I didn’t see. Or rather, she saw what was missing: Something astatine stake. Some compelling reply to the question, “So what?” successful effect to the particulars of the concern Schar-then-Rebecca recovered herself in. If thing mattered, past I didn’t person a story. Not yet.
Once I considered Schar’s desires, reconsidered erstwhile successful the timeline of her beingness that we conscionable her, and made definite she and the different characters were neither impossibly cleanable nor cartoonishly evil—then, I had a story.
___________________________________
The True Confessions of First Lady Freeman by Deesha Philyaw is disposable via Mariner Books.
English (US) ·